|
|
2000: A UK television channel mentions a study by Swedish scientists, which shows that Chernobyl was the likely explanation for 849 cancer cases in Northern Sweden – the programme then stated the findings are disputed by the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority. |
|
|
1 May 2005: A UK Sunday newspaper mentions that ‘the Tartan Army’ is being warned about traveling to Belarus because of worries about another explosion in Chernobyl. It mentions a football fan who paid £300 for flights and is concerned about the validity of his travel insurance should he be affected by radiation. |
|
|
26 May 2005: A UK tabloid quotes a scientist whose research found that the disaster has spawned a generation of mutant, super brainy children. |
|
|
5 September 2005: A Greenpeace Press Release strongly disputes the conclusion of the IAEA ‘Chernobyl Legacy’ report, which allegedly states that only 50 deaths can be directly attributed to radiation from the disaster, accusing them of whitewashing the impact of Chernobyl. |
|
|
7 September 2005: A local UK paper prints a quote stating that the Chernobyl impact was much smaller than could have been predicted and that the danger of radiation has largely disappeared. |
| Based on CCLL volunteers own experiences working
with Chernobyl children in the UK and their involvement and work with
their families and Belarusian communities, we believe the health, social
and economic consequences of Chernobyl are very real and will continue
to be so for many years to come. The consequences of the Chernobyl accident
have not gone away, but the level of support for the contaminated areas,
both national and international has declined. This is a great concern
and one voiced by CORE, a Belarusian organisation working with communities
in the contaminated areas. www.core-chernobyl.org/eng
We have identified web sites that appear to provide
reliable information and these can be found on the Links page. |